Your Ted Lasso Viewing Guide

I like to give the people what they want. Perhaps I’m a people pleaser, like Ted Lasso.

One of the more consistently popular posts on this fancy schmancy blog is my “Star Wars Rebels” viewing guide, which frankly does more heavy lifting than I would prefer.

There’s a lot of other writing here, my people. Branch out. (Please!)

Anyway, to help ease the burden on that poor Rebels post, I thought it advisable to do another viewing guide or two, and with “Ted Lasso,” one of my all-time favorite shows set to make its (hopefully) triumphant return this summer, and because I often encounter people who don’t seem keen on ingesting the entirety of the program start to finish, I’ve lifted some of the highlights from the show and provided an outline below.

Essentially, this is my ideal way to consume the show if you don’t think wikipedia summaries are good enough, but you don’t want to commit to watching the whole darn thing.

Let’s be honest, some of the episodes are better or more important to the overarching narrative than others. And that’s okay! You’ve still got time to watch (or rewatch!) the entire run if you want (and I recommend that you do so!), but hey, if you’re thinking, “It’s time I saw what the fuss was about,” or “Man, I really want to rewatch some of it,” but don’t want to go whole hog, this is the guide for you.

If you’re new to the series, the case for “Ted Lasso” is the case for kindness and sincerity. That might sound a little boring at the outset, but I think what most people who have opened themselves to the show have discovered is that there is a surprising freshness to it. That’s probably (certainly?) an indictment of modern society in general, though it’s also what ultimately makes the show work. When you go in expecting cynicism and sarcasm, and the characters instead behave in a different (albeit still realistic) manner, the show can become a little less predictable, and well, that keeps the narrative interesting.

The secret sauce of kindness, then, is what gives the show its vitality, in sharp contrast to any feared boredom. And as a result, it becomes very much worth engaging with, PARTICULARLY if you feel a little tired of negativity (I want to acknowledge that this show, and its kindness, was a soothing balm for many of us during the pandemic).

With this guide, you’ll get the best moments from the show, the best episodes, and most of the key plot elements (though some of the plot will get trimmed here – it’s the nature of the process). I apologize to fans if your favorite episode doesn’t get included. Again, this is the nature of the process. And it’s just one dude’s list. Your list can be different and that’s cool.

With all that said, let’s get started with the DEFINITIVE (j/k) Ted Lasso viewing guide.

Barbecue sauce.

Continue reading Your Ted Lasso Viewing Guide

Star Fox 64 review

It’s kind of a tough call to pick between the original “Star Fox” and its N64 reinvisioning, at least for this writer.

Thankfully, I don’t have to make that call here, since this is more about evaluating “Star Fox 64” in a vacuum.

In that context, 64 is an unqualified success, boasting a proper advancement of the controls, story, graphics, and sound you’d expect from the era, resulting in one of the better rail shooters you’ll find anywhere.

The branching paths are really what will make or break the game for most people. If you’re a fan, they’ll extend the life of the game considerably. If you’re less enthused, well, this is an hour or two of a good time and that’s pretty much it.

I think with the announcement of the Switch 2 remake, more people will try checking this one out. They’ll be greeted by a game that is self-assured and enjoyable. Not ground-breaking. Just good.

Dave’s Score: 8/10

Ice Climber review

I’ve always thought “Ice Climber” is pretty sucky.

But I’ve also wondered if maybe I wasn’t being fair with that opinion since lots of folks go to bat for the game, Nintendo itself seems fond of it by choosing to include the characters in its “Super Smash Bros.” series, and I’d just personally never managed to make it through more than about five minutes without turning the game off in utter annoyance.

Maybe it needed a full evaluation.

So I sat down and committed myself to playing through all 32 levels of the thing, braving super basic design, unavoidable deaths, baffling scoring systems, muddled hit boxes, and terrible jumping mechanics to give it its proper due.

And yes, Ice Climber is pretty sucky.

The main enjoyment I got from this game was the knowledge that when I completed it I could come on the Internet and talk about how much I dislike it.

Truly, I think people who say they like this game are either messing with you or kidding themselves.

It’s like breaking a toe. Yeah, it’s better than breaking your whole leg, and you can tape it up with a buddy toe and hobble around with it, but you don’t enjoy doing that.

And that’s what it feels like navigating these controls: It’s as though you’re encumbered by them, not helped. That’s Ice Climber in whole: hobbling around with a broken toe.

I’ll give it a few points for originality and historical relevance and move along to better pursuits.

Dave’s Score: 4/10

StarTropics review

This one has been a long time coming. I’ve had “StarTropics” on my to-do list pretty much since it was released for the NES in 1990.

I can’t explain very well why I hadn’t committed to sit down and finish it in all that time, though I believe that conversation begins with the notion of “NES hard” and an aversion to the time commitment of an RPG. Regardless, I’ve now finally completed it.

(The RPG hang up was probably a little misplaced, because this game leans into adventurey, Zelda-like tendencies.)

But a proper review of the game needs to address firstly its charm, which is downright irresistible. The island setting surely helps in that, imbuing a sense of spirit and tone from the jump. The humor only helps, contributing to the light mood, and the action and plot are satisfying to navigate.

Having all of those points in its favor serves StarTropics well, because the game has a series of knocks against it well before it flies completely off the rails in the final act.

The sluggish controls and unforgiving enemies/easy deaths are a smidge too much. This game earns its reputation for being tough. And there’s a lot of silly backtracking and fetch-questing that irritates. And oh yeah, some of the puzzles sorta suck.

The last level definitely sucks, at least until you get properly leveled up. But I bring all this up to emphasize just how much heavy lifting the aforementioned charm has to do. It’s like this clumsy baby deer sliding around on the ice. You find it adorable despite, nay, because of its missteps. That this game ultimately succeeds is wild to me.

I can’t give it an 8, but this is a very high 7, flirting with must-play status for NES fans.

Dave’s Score: 7/10

Pinball review

One of the original releases on the old Nintendo Entertainment System was “Pinball,” which wasn’t much for wowing people. It was there strictly for variety, like those doughy donuts at the Chinese buffet. No one goes to the buffet for those doughy donuts. But them being there give you something else to munch on that doesn’t much resemble anything else there. And they’re comforting.

That’s Pinball. Nintendo’s effort, spearheaded by HAL, is low on frills (no music at all) and suffers from some floaty physics that irk purists. The theming is weirdly mismatched, featuring ducks, penguins, and casino playing cards. No, I do not understand what is going on here.

It’s not a landmark title within the genre, though it deserves a look for the sheer “Nintendo-ness” of it all. Mario makes a nonsensical appearance in the bonus area, and for console gaming pinball enthusiasts circa the mid 1980s, this was about as well as one could do.

The Internet told me that clearing 250,000 points qualifies as having given the game its proper paces. That’s a good thing, because I’m not sure I’d have the patience for the full million. I do recommend trying to hit 100,000 at minimum, as you’re greeted by a supremely wonky surprise at that point. It’s so strange, I had to pause the game and look up if it was intentional or some kind of glitch. That experience kind of made the game for me, if I’m honest. I found it charming.

In the final analysis, the game provides that sort of trance-like getaway that video pinball needs to provide, earning it a passing grade and my patented “tepid thumbs up” ranking.

Dave’s Score: 7/10

The Legend of Zelda: The Wind Waker review

I think most people already know a fair bit about this one. But for those who don’t, “Wind Waker” continues the tradition of 3D Zelda established in “Ocarina of Time,” bumping up the graphical output for the GameCube and building a much larger adventure in the process.

People were mixed on the cartoonish visuals at the time (and some still are I suppose), though frankly the thing is gorgeous, a better-looking Zelda than probably anything other than the two newer Switch titles.

It also boasts a killer soundtrack, a great sense of design and style, solid bosses and weaponry, a fairly unique story, and its sense of scale and exploration again only take a backseat to the two modern Zelda entries.

I think the sailing and digging for treasure bits are super repetitive, though I suppose I had more fun there than I would have expected. The bigger issue to me is how confusing some of the side quests are. That on the face of it could be okay … but the “side quests“ are actually tied into the main game. You’re required to complete them. So, them being cryptic is a frigging problem.

I’ve come to appreciate modern Zelda for its lack of these roadblocks. And yet, I think there’s a place for traditional 3D Zelda too. We can all point to our favorites within that. This one is below Ocarina and “Majora’s Mask” for me. Beyond that? Kind of a grab bag. These are great games, but mileage will vary some from title to title.

If you want a beautiful, longer Zelda, this might be your huckleberry.

Dave’s Score: 9/10

X-Men Legends II: Rise of Apocalypse review

I am predisposed toward enjoying any game I get to experience with a family member. In this case, I played through “X-Men Legends II” with my son. So, this game is liable to get a better score because of this — this is acknowledged.

Stepping back from it, beyond the multiplayer appeal of the X-Men Legends series, it’s also relatively creative in its approach, mixing dungeon crawling, melee combat, and rpg-style leveling up/equipping to great effect.

The X-Men are a natural pairing for this kind of game too, as part of the appeal is mixing and matching your teammates (four at any time) to adjust to varying situations. Maybe you need to get to a hard-to-reach area. Or remove an obstruction. Or you need to lean into long-range attacks during a battle scenario. the various mutants with different abilities match the demands of the game.

Where the sequel ups the ante from the first title is to give you access to the enemies from Magneto’s brotherhood to fold into your team, providing a whole host of new game styles and fun characters to commandeer.

I loved the first game in the series. It honestly flirts with my Top 100, and while I think the law of diminishing returns is in effect with the sequel, I can’t deny having a goofy grin plastered across my face for much of the playtime.

Dave’s Score: 8/10

Balloon Fight review

The older, Nintendo-published “black box” games on the NES are, on the whole, an interesting experience.

Most of them feel a little arcadey, for lack of a better term, calling to mind previous generations of home gaming which aimed to recreate the arcade experience at home in lieu of basically everything else.

“Balloon Fight” is no exception. It involves a single screen of little dudes floating about via balloon. The object is to be like Obi-Wan and get the high ground (or high “air”) from where you can pop the other balloons, rather than have yours popped instead.

The basic game is fun enough, but it turns into an endless repeating level quest, wherein you try to get high scores before you eventually die.

Like I said, arcadey.

I enjoy it in bursts, but it’s not the sort of thing I make a point to return to.

Dave’s Score: 7/10

Tempest 2000  — Retro Gaming Essentials (No. 52)

The history of Atari in video games is vast and super interesting, and I think for that reason, the company’s representation in this countdown might be a little lacking. 

Hey, I can admit my failings. 

It’s also never too late to change.

That having been said, we’re still in the “These games deserve an ‘A’ on the report card” range of the retro essentials list (9s and 10s), and I’ve gotta be honest: it might be a stretch to go that far on most of Atari’s classics.

Do I like “Asteroids?” Sure. Do I think it’s an absolute must-play in the same way that “Pong” is? No, I’m not going to go that far with it. Pong might get a historical bonus that elevates it above other games that didn’t matter quite so much (as do many of the games on this list that have an influential streak a mile wide). But a game’s still gotta be a fun time that holds up in some manner. 

Table tennis, to me, is pretty much timeless. Shooting asteroids is … kinda boring.

Yeah, I said it.

Anyway, trying to grapple with those kinds of decisions is what this list is all about. 

Fortunately, we have a sequel to a game that originally hit during Atari’s heyday that landed on an obscure gaming system in the early 90s, which offers the opportunity to speak to that company’s important history, while simultaneously being an absolute banger of a game that holds up incredibly well today.

Prepare your loins for “Tempest 2000,” a fever dream gaming experience that will scratch the kinds of itches you didn’t even know you had.

Tempest 2000 at a glance:

Genre: Tunnel shooter
Released: 1994
Platform: Jaguar
No. 17 on GamesMaster’s Top 100 Games of All Time
Continue reading Tempest 2000  — Retro Gaming Essentials (No. 52)

Xevious (NES) review

One of the very first vertically scrolling shooters, “Xevious” stood out quite a bit at release for having a varied, topographical background rather than a simple star field.

It’s also a smart game, varying the enemies it sends at you based on the way you play.

All of this is really cool.

The NES port is … okay. It literally never ends. And it’s a tough game. And of course, as an NES shooter, it’s ugly.

It didn’t piss me off like “Star Soldier” did, so that’s something. But it’s definitely dated.

How much you enjoy probably depends on how much you appreciate the historical importance.

I like video game history, so …

Dave’s Score: 7/10